a list compiled by Alex Kasman (College of Charleston)

Home All New Browse Search About

Coyote Moon (2003)
John A. Miller
Note: This work of mathematical fiction is recommended by Alex for literati.

Well, this book is hard to describe! It's certainly different and not easily categorizable. It is a novel that addresses the question "What if a young, nerdy, MIT mathematics professor died of cancer and was reborn into the fully grown, really muscular body of the most talented rookie in major leage baseball?" It also addresses the question "What if this didn't happen, but a bunch of coincidences made it seem as if it had?"

Arthur Hodges, the kind of math professor who loves only math (having no sexual relationships, no interest in sports, etc.) dies, leaving his older friend (also a math professor, but one with more of a life) depressed. The older gentleman leaves his job and his family and goes to live in a trailer park in the desert. There he meets a gentleman who has faith that God has a plan for him. (His belief in God traces back to World War II where he was a soldier fighting for the Nazis and was saved from a dire situation.) It is his belief that the new rookie with the habit of spouting mathematics is, in fact, the recently deceased Arthur Hodges and, thinking it is all part of the plan, arranges for him to come live in the trailer park as well.

The book gives both the older mathematician and the rookie lots of opportunities to talk about mathematics. They talk about Fibonacci sequences, solving nonlinear equations, the fundamental theorem of calculus, factoring polynomials, quantum mechanics, and relativity. Eventually, the people they are speaking to become interested in this stuff. (At one point, his teammates urge the rookie to "tell [them] again" about rational numbers!) But, the author's understanding of these things is not very deep. So, although he is able to describe most of it without making any real mistakes, the mathematics itself will not be of much interest to anyone who has ever encountered these concepts before. Still, it is a lot of fun to hear these words coming out of the mouth of a professional baseball player and to be able to see the reactions of those around him.

The book does not make a distinction between "mathematician" and "theoretical physicist". Although I, as someone who has a degree in mathematics but often publishes in physics journals, would certainly admit that the boundary between the two is quite fuzzy, the terms are certainly not synonymous. It is not clear even after having read the entire book whether these characters were mathematicians or physicists.

Although most of the mathematics discussed is basically correct, the author gets a little bit confused when talking about the "golden mean". This irrational number is equal to half of one plus the square root of five and shows up in a variety of contexts (Fibonacci sequences and the anatomy of plants and spiral shaped shells) because of its connection to self similarity. (Specifically, if you have a rectangle with this aspect ratio, then it can be divided into a square and another rectangle having the same aspect ratio.) It has the property that when you square it you get the same number as you would by adding one to it. (That is, it solves the equation 1+x=x2.) Strangely, this book incorrectly states explicitly that this is not true. (It says they are close but not equal.) I think the author is confused. Perhaps he was thinking of the fact that many people try to approximate irrational numbers with rational numbers, and any rational approximation of the golden mean would not quite satisfy this equation. But, that is why those approximations are not really the golden mean! You can check that one half of one plus the square root of five does satisfy this equation exactly.

I very much enjoyed reading this book and recommend it to others who like mathematical fiction. It is not a perfect book, but it is definitely worth reading.

Contributed by Kathryn

This book was very strange. I know that we were supposed to see his math comments as the old professor coming out in him, but they turned out to just be awkward and seemed to come from the dictionary. I thought the author could have done a better job of integrating them better into the book where the baseball player would have been more comfortable with what he was saying.

More information about this work can be found at
(Note: This is just one work of mathematical fiction from the list. To see the entire list or to see more works of mathematical fiction, return to the Homepage.)

Works Similar to Coyote Moon
According to my `secret formula', the following works of mathematical fiction are similar to this one:
  1. After Math by Miriam Webster
  2. The Visiting Professor by Robert Littell
  3. Improbable by Adam Fawer
  4. Habitus by James Flint
  5. Math Takes a Holiday by Paul Di Filippo
  6. Threshold by Sara Douglass
  7. The World We Make by N. K. Jemisin
  8. The Dark Lord by Patricia Simpson
  9. Flatterland: like Flatland, only more so by Ian Stewart
  10. The Fairytale of the Completely Symmetrical Butterfly by Dietmar Dath
Ratings for Coyote Moon:
RatingsHave you seen/read this work of mathematical fiction? Then click here to enter your own votes on its mathematical content and literary quality or send me comments to post on this Webpage.
Mathematical Content:
3.33/5 (3 votes)
Literary Quality:
3/5 (3 votes)

MotifGenius, Math as Cold/Dry/Useless, Romance, Religion,
TopicAlgebra/Arithmetic/Number Theory, Analysis/Calculus/Differential, Mathematical Physics,

Home All New Browse Search About

Exciting News: The 1,600th entry was recently added to this database of mathematical fiction! Also, for those of you interested in non-fictional math books let me (shamelessly) plug the recent release of the second edition of my soliton theory textbook.

(Maintained by Alex Kasman, College of Charleston)